When workers are properly treated like employees, the employer is required to withhold federal, state and local income tax from the employee’s paycheck and pay such income tax withholdings to the appropriate government agency. When workers are treated as employees, the employer is also required to withhold and pay-over the employee-portion of social security tax (6.2% on wages up to the wage base limit) and medicare tax (1.45% on wages without limit), and to pay the employer-portion of social security (also 6.2%) and medicare tax (also 1.45%).
When workers are properly treated as independent contractors, the employer is not required to withhold income tax or payroll tax from the workers paycheck, and is not required to pay the employer-portion of social security or medicare tax. Rather, the worker is treated as self-employed, and is liable to make quarterly estimated payments of income tax and self-employment tax. Self-employment is the functional equivalent of the employer and employee payroll taxes. Self-employment tax is assessed at the rate of 15.3% on wages up to the wage base limit, then 2.9% on all wages over the wage base limit.
When workers are treated like employees, the employer bears half of the payroll tax burden, and has the responsibility to withhold and pay income and payroll taxes to the government. When workers are treated as independent contractors, the worker bears all of the payroll tax burden, and the employer is not required to withhold or pay-over any tax withholdings. When workers are treated as contractors, the workers also generally do not qualify to participate in health insurance, retirement plans and other fringe benefit programs established for employees. For these reasons, employers are often encouraged to characterize workers as contractors rather than employees.
The IRS looks at worker classification issues closely on audit. The IRS applies a 20-factor test to determine whether workers should properly be classified as employees or contractors. Although the IRS test refers to 20 factors, the IRS test really boils down to 2 issues. First, does the employer control the manner and methods by which the worker does his or her job? That is, does the employer control the worker to the extent that the employer tells the worker how, where and when to do the job?
Second, does the worker have a risk of loss on the job? A contractor has to run a business and pay bills, and the cost of labor or supplies on a job may exceed the amount the contractor collects on the job. On the other hand, employees are paid a set wage by the hour, day, week or other period, and employee expenditures are reimbursed, so employees do not generally have a risk of loss.
If the IRS determines that an employee has been misclassified as a contractor, the IRS will generally look to the employer to make-up both the employer and the employee portion of income and payroll taxes. If the employer is insolvent and cannot pay such taxes, the IRS will go after any responsible party. For this purpose, a responsible party is any person who had the apparent power and authority (ie, a corporate officer) to make decisions concerning which creditors were paid.
Misclassification of workers can be a very expensive mistake. The employer may need to pay income and payroll tax, penalties and interest, and may need to make additional contributions to employee retirement, health insurance and other fringe benefit arrangements. There are some defenses and safe-havens available when the IRS questions worker classification. But it is better to assess your situation, and either correct your classification or prepare your defense strategy, before the IRS raises the issue. If you want to discuss worker classification issues, please give me a call. Jsenney@pselaw.com or 937-223-1130 .
Send a copy of SenneySays along to your to your friends.
Serving Dayton , Serving You
Pickrel, Schaeffer & Ebeling Co., LPA, 2700 Kettering Tower , Dayton OH 45423
Tax, Business, ERISA, Employee Benefits, Real Estate, Construction Law, Private Placement Security Law, Employment Law, Workers Compensation, Probate, Estate Planning, Succession Planning, Immigration Law, Litigation, Arbitration, Mediation
No comments:
Post a Comment